Register

To become a member of ITProPortal Register here.

Already a member? Login here

Please register below. All we need is a valid email address and a password.

Please use a real email address as we need to email you to confirm your account.
Must be at least 6 characters long.

Benefits of joining ITProPortal:

  • Unlimited Access to Special Reports and White Papers
  • Exclusive offers and discounts
  • Free entry to all competitions
  • Access to beta sections of ITProPortal.com

Login to your account



Forgot your password?


Comment : Why is there such a lack of transparency when it comes to line contention?

Comment : Why is there such a lack of transparency when it comes to line contention?
  • Digg del.icio.us reddit Facebook

Contention essentially implies you are sharing bandwidth with another consumer, the contention ratio being the maximum number of consumers you could share that bandwidth with.

With current demands for applications such as hosted VoIP and with the transferring of other mission critical data, a 1:1 contention ratio is essential.

As if no readily available information on the contention ratio of a product doesn't make things hard enough, you may be surprised to know that sometimes 1:1 does not guarantee zero contention at every stage of delivery.

Contention can occur in any one of the three stages of delivery; the exchange, on the backhaul from the exchange to the ISP's network and from there on to the internet.

If an ISP claims to have an uncontended network and that they 'handle the contention' on their network, they are only guaranteeing a 1:1 contention ratio at stage 1 of delivery.

As a result, there’s a good chance there is contention in backhaul and so the promise of 1:1 contention becomes meaningless.

As we push the boundaries of broadband forward, DSL short comings are becoming increasingly apparent. Reducing the potential points of failure with fibre leased lines for true dedicated services is highly sought after by the businesses that can justify the cost of implementation.

Posted by Piers Daniell on 21 July 2008

Tags: VoIP